How work gets done. Guaranteed!


Dismiss Important alert: May 9, 2012 11:29:40 AM EDT.
  • My apologies for the inconvenience: the system for processing emailed responses was not processing all of them correctly (and it was only reported to us recently, so we didn't realize it). This has been fixed, but may result in older messages (from the last two weeks) showing up on May 8 and May 9 in your message thread. We have also taken steps to monitor this system more closely so we will know immediately in the future if there is a problem. Again, my apologies and thanks for your understanding. Ian Ippolito CEO and Founder of vWorker
  • Attention employers: One Million by One Million is looking to interview employers who have used vWorker to help build their business and have earned at least $1 million in revenue over the past 12 months. Your company must be independently held and you must be willing to openly discuss revenue numbers. If you are interested in being interviewed, please contact us for more information.

Project Payment Models (for Employers)
(Click here to see this information for workers)

There are two different ways to pay a worker on your outsourcing project: pay-for-deliverables and pay-for-time. Each comes with an industry-leading money-back guarantee. Below is an explanation of when to choose one over the other.
 

Pay-for-time (via accubilling money-back guaranteetm*)

You pay the worker by the hour and they log their time using the AccuTimeCard™. If for any reason they: we'll credit your money back. We also give you the ability to view images of their desktop (and optionally their webcam) as they work, so you always know what they are doing.


Click here to read more about the AccuTimeCard™.

  • Advantages:
    • Handles both large and small projects, as well as weekly recurring work, very well.
    • Cheaper (28-40%) and lower project failure rate (1-5% versus 11-27%) than pay-for-deliverables.
  • Disadvantages:
    • Requires you to have the time and ability to regularly review their work, and approve their weekly timecard. (However, if you can't or don't want to do this, you can hire a Sherpa for a few hours a week to do this for you. The combined cost of doing both, is often cheaper than using standard pay-for-deliverables for all but the smallest projects).

 
Pay-for-deliverables (via triple-point money-back guaranteetm*)

You pay the worker a fixed price for the entire project (or for each portion of it, if you prefer to pay with milestone payments). They must deliver the project:
  1. To-contract (100% as described in your contract, and meeting industry-wide expected standards).
  2. On-time
  3. On-budget
or we credit your money back.
  • Advantages:
    • Strongest protection of your money. It will not be lost if the project fails.
    • Works best on small projects and the first time you are working with a new worker.
  • Disadvantages:
    • More expensive (28-40%), and higher project failure rate (11-25% versus 1-5%) than pay-for-time.
    • Not recommended for larger projects or weekly recurring work.

 
Crowdsourcing / Trialsourcing (via Contest money-back guaranteetm*)

Workers compete to complete your contest for a prize. If you do not get any entries that you like, we credit your prize money back to you.
  • Exception: If you choose to guarantee to award a prize, then you must do so, and cannot exercise this guarantee.
  • If you exercise this guarantee, all contestants retain all copyrights to their work. In other words, you cannot use any work submitted to you.
Click here for more information on crowdsourcing and trialsourcing.


Click here for full guarantee terms and conditions.